Thursday, August 31, 2017

Portfolio II (Arizona Portfolioi) ~ Gold toned Kallitype

The basic Oregon Portfolio has been printed, with the final image shown with its diptych mate in the last post; "Sailboat on  Canal". The print today is a gold toned Kallitype, continuing on with the Kallitype portfolio of 8x10 prints, mostly of Arizona. I find it pretty interesting to be printing in silver again. in a mirror process to the platinum/palladium process. The only difference being the dilution of the ferric oxalate solution; 27% for Pt/Pd and 20% for silver. As a side to this, I will mention, again, that the ferric ammonium oxalate works fine with Pt/Pd, making it a printing out process, whereas using ferric ammonium oxalate with silver in the Kallitype process does not work so well, if, gold toning is desired. I have yet to try other toners, but am not all that enamored with the process enough to wade deep into chemical testing to find out. I am fine with the standard Kallitype processing.

The print I'm posting here is a Kallitype made from a digital negative I printed some time ago to try out making a Pt/Pd print of it, printed in the UV printer. First test came out about half printed in, looking to me to be far more advanced, with the "stage whisper" image before developing. I'll know better next time. I am still looking closely at the differences between a silver image, Kallitype or salted silver, next to palladium and platinum/palladium to try and differentiate between the middle tone differences, as in how the middle tones are represented in gray tones. I would not be the best person to do this with my color deficiencies, but I can see the basic differences. The silver tends to be more neutral in gray tones, whereas the influence of platinum adds a lighter more 'steely' gray. Palladium is just a warmer toned image.

What the printer can take away from this is that silver can emulate palladium~platinum/palladium, by the process used and the toner used thereafter. Developing a Kallitype image in sodium citrate warms the print, emulating a palladium image. Developing with sodium acetate leaves a very 'black & white' image emulating a platinum in color, especially when gold toned. Developing a Kallitype in sodium acetate then toning in palladium toner leaves a warm toned image with deep dMax blacks, much like what you might see in a platinum/palladium. Knowing these differences allows the printer a range of options for final print color, and generally how the print looks overall.

This print was made from a digital negative, developed in sodium acetate (black developer) then toned in a gold/citric acid toner for the deepening of the blacks and crispness in the whites. Personally, I think the image would look even better when it has been printed in Pt/Pd. But that's just me.

Gold toned Kallitype
"Desert Blooms" ~ 8x10 ~ 1/5
Cochise Strong Hold, Arizona

Monday, August 28, 2017

Final Print in "Oregon Portfolio"

Once I began making palladium prints, it was a rebirth of printing spirits for me. Adding to that the recent discovery of the Na2 process using platinum, I really have little interesting in printing in any other medium, save gum. Anyone having visited this blog know first hand my feeling for platinum/palladium printing being the grail of hand coated printmaking. I announce it here that I will complete the Gold toned Kallitype print portfolio I had begun, before the palladium periood.

This image is the final addition to the Oregon Portfolio of 5x7 platinum/palladium prints. These negatives were all shot thirty years using my Burke & James 5x7 flatbed view camera. The one I use today, well, actually next week. This image is the second shot taken of a gimme shot. The first image I have posted before. This second image continues the theme of the sailboat on the canal. The first image I have is of the canal itself, without any sailboat. The point of this shot was testing a new developer; (Windish) pyro/OH. This was the first image using this new formula. I took the shot to test how well the foreground would show up when shooting directly into the sun, seen on the horizon, to the right of the sailboat. Just as I clicked the shutter on that image I hear the putt putt of the sailboat's motor, as it came out of the refuge area and turned into the canal.

This is the second shot I got off having quickly replaced the dark slide on the first shot, flipping over the cut film holder, pulling out the dark slide and resetting the lens, I got off this shot before it sailed out of sight. I have only shown this/these two images together, as a diptych, as together they make up an image greater than either of them would alone.

Film; Kodak Super XX (250/125)
Developed; Pyro/OH 12 minutes
Paper; Revere Platinum (smooth side)
Printed; Palladium ~ Direct Sun ~ 3 minutes
Developer; Ammonium Citrate
(First image ~ same film/treatment

"Sailboat on Canal" ~ Two Images ~ As a Diptych
















Thursday, August 24, 2017

Platinum/Palladium Print ~ Portfolio nearly complete

This image, along with a second image to "Sailboat on Canal" will complete this portfolio of 5x7 platinum/palladium prints. Most of these images are scenics from Oregon. The next portfolio will be focused mostly on images of Arizona, beginning the the newest images shot at Cochise Strong Hold in southwestern Arizona. That portfolio will be made up of 8x10 platinum/palladium prints.

The images from this time frame of shooting with the Burke & James 5x7 view camera make up a period whereupon I preferred the densities shifted upwards towards the shoulder. This increased detail in the image, mostly in the lower tonal ranges where they might normally be lost in deeper shades of gray, or black. I also used a fully compensating developer; a rejiggered formula of the Windish Pyro formula, using sodium hydroxide as the accelerator. This is the saving grace to the images, keeping the upper tonal ranges zone 6-8 separated from the lower ranges. Looking back, I would alter that formula, sliding the image back down the contrast index curve about one stop, which would return the shadow areas and deepen the blacks. Interpretation of an image, through development is everything.

This image negative is pretty much the same as the earlier samples; this print is unlikely to make it into the final portfolio, as it is an uninspiring for me. Not worthy a Pt/Pd print.

The Negative: Kodak Super XX (250/125)
Negative Developer; Pyro/hydroxide 16 minutes (Windish Pyro) reformulated
Paper; Revere Platinum
Print Developer; Ammonium Citrate (Bostick & Sullivan) pre-mix
Coating solution; (5x7) Palladium 12 drops ~ Ferric Oxalate (Part 1) 11 drops,
                               platinum (sodium chloroplatinate) @ 2.5% (solution) 2 drops.

"Willamette River Afternoon #2" ~ 5x7 ~ 2/5
Eugene, Oregon



































Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Platinum/Palladium Print

A second platinum/palladium print finished today. This one had a correct print time. Another image out of the Oregon scenics. This one was shot at Fern Ridge Reservoir, just before sunset. Oregon isn't known for their big sky fluffy clouds type of place for much of the year. There is a lot of zone 7 skies, of overall gray skies without any way to know where the sun is at any given time. This was one  of those days.

The differences that can be seen between the salted silver version and the platinum/palladium print version of this image is the steely gray of the foliage in this image, compared to the silver image. There is a distinct color of each of these prints. Personally speaking, I prefer the platinum grays to the silver grays.

This negative was much like the last ones;

Negative; Kodak Super XX (250/125) Developed; Pyro/OH (Reformulated Windish) 15 minutes
Platinum/Palladium mix; Pt 2.5% solution (2 drops) ~ Palladium 12 drops ~ Ferric Oxalate 11 drops
Print time 9 minutes ~ Full sun
Paper; Revere Platinum 140# ~ Developer; Ammonium Citrate

"The Train Trestle" ~ 5x7 ~ 2/5
Eugene, Oregon

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

New Platinum/Palladium prints

The printing work on the new portfolio continues with two added images from that 5x7 series. These are the same images I printed thirty years ago, in the salt paper process. The close resemblance between those original silver images and the ones I'm printing today in platinum/palladium is fairly amazing to me. I see the Pt/Pd images a bit richer, deeper blacks and a bit better tonal separation over the silver prints.

These negatives are also don't have the density range of the earlier negatives I've been printing. Those negatives demand a twenty minute print time in full sun, using the 2 drops of 2.5% platinum solution to the palladium mix. The images I'm printing now I'm using 10% platinum solution to boost contrast. The print times are then half of the 20 minute time of the denser negatives.

This print is one I want to get exactly right. This test run was just a bit short of that. This was a twenty  minute print time, using the 2.5% platinum solution added to the palladium mixture; this image will likely need a 23-24 minute print time, full sun.

Negative; Kodak Super XX (250/125) Developed; Pyro/OH (Reformulated Windish) 18 minutes
Platinum/Palladium mix; Pt 2.5% solution (2 drops) ~ Palladium 12 drops ~ Ferric Oxalate 11 drops
Print time 20 minutes ~ Full sun
Paper; Revere Platinum 140# ~ Developer; Ammonium Citrate

"Overlook Cougar Reservoir" Unfinished Print

Sunday, August 20, 2017

Oregon Scenic ~ Platinum/Palladium Print

Another Oregon scenic I was able to capture during a late afternoon photographic outing with the 5x7 was at a watering hole that was very popular with Oregonians was Cougar Reservoir, which also hosted the Cougar Hot Springs, and that was nothing short of deeply awesome. Those were geothermal hot springs, so no odors, just lots of hot water moving from one pool to the next in an ever increasingly cooler movement from one pool to the next. If you were hearty, you sat in the first pool, just below the small cave from whence the water flowed.

There is a condition in the Willamette Valley of Oregon referred by photographers as "zone 7 skies", another way of saying there is no visible point of where the sun might be, with the entire sky being an overall light gray, like a dome over the earth, sort of illuminated but no discernible location of the sun. That can lasts for weeks. For photographers who demand fluffy clouds in the sky to make the scene, it would be painful. I didn't let that stop my shooting. Irritating as that was at the time. Same negative treatment and same printing formula, with exception to print times.

The Negative: Kodak Super XX (250)
Negative Developer; Pyro/hydroxide 15 minutes (Windish Pyro) reformulated
Paper; Revere Platinum
Print Developer; Ammonium Citrate (Bostick & Sullivan) pre-mix
Coating solution; (5x7) Palladium 12 drops (B&S pre-mix) ~ Ferric Oxalate (Part 1) 11 drops, platinum (sodium chloroplatinate) @ 2.5% (solution) 2 drops.

Platinum/Palladium Print
"Cougar Reservoir" ~ 5x7 ~ 2/5
Willamette National Forest, Oregon

Saturday, August 19, 2017

Oregon Scenic ~ Platinum/Palladim Print

I spent many hours along the banks of the Willamette River during the thirteen years I lived in Eugene, Oregon, as the images I'm posting exemplify. Being a single parent of two short people at the time, early morning shooting just wasn't in the stars, especially considering I also kept a commercial photo studio in business, after the gallery fire fiasco killed that earlier enterprise. Afternoon shooting was not only more easily fitted into my daily schedule, but also offered up the warm afternoon sunlight which I prefer to the cooler early morning sunlight. Shooting in the middle of the day works for some, depending on the subject matter and photographer's intent.

This image is one of those late afternoon shots, just before sunset when the sunlight is certainly in the warm spectrum. One of those scenes looking up river when all else is settling in for the evening, and only the sounds of buzzing insects permeate the scene. The negative of this image, and the rest of the Oregon and Arizona images at that time were all developed in the Windish pyro formula I re-jiggered to be a use and toss formula. This particular image was one of the earlier scenes I shot during that period, using the pyro/OH formula, and it was developed for a shorter time; 15 minutes. As can be seen below, all the other variables are roughly the same.

The Negative: Kodak Super XX (250)
Negative Developer; Pyro/hydroxide 15 minutes (Windish Pyro) reformulated
Paper; Revere Platinum
Print Developer; Ammonium Citrate (Bostick & Sullivan) pre-mix
Coating solution; (5x7) Palladium 12 drops (B&S pre-mix) ~ Ferric Oxalate (Part 1) 11 drops, platinum (sodium chloroplatinate) @ 2.5% (solution) 2 drops.

Platinum/Palladium Print
"Sunset Willamette" ~ 5x7 ~ 2/5
Eugene, Oregon




































Friday, August 18, 2017

More Platinum/Palladium Prints

The long and painful wait for replacing the dying hard disk on my Mac Book has come and gone. What used to take three or more minutes to load Lightroom, now takes less than eight second. The personal joy felt about this goes without saying as it were. Although having just said it...

The printing has continued in the interim, with seven completed prints in the new portfolio of 5x7 platinum/palladium prints. There will be at least a dozen prints in this portfolio, for now. Once this portfolio is completed I will return to the 8x10 portfolio I began some weeks ago. At that time the plan was to print 8x10 gold toned Kallitype prints, with the intent of visually replicating a platinum influenced image, with the deep blacks and long tonal scales of gray. That was before realizing the (Na2) process of palladium printing.

That original portfolio plan will now in all likelihood now be printed in platinum/palladium, as the negatives to be used will all be digitally created. I have already tested one such print using a digital negative, with an added <curve> adjustment. Turns out, its density range was more than needed for printing in my UV printer. The 5x7 negatives are all being printed in direct sunlight, being their density range for many of the negatives are up into the log 1.8 density range. That translates to about a thirty minute or more print time, hence using the sun. The digital negatives I am aim for will be far closer to log 1.0. The (Na2) platinum solution at likely the 5% level will do the rest. I am working towards a print time of 8-10 minutes in the UV printer. My print time for the 5x7 negatives is between 8 and 20 minutes in full sun, with the final print of a Willamette River scene being the 20 minute print. That image below.

One of the things I tend to discuss at some point is print pricing, along with limited editions and presentation demands at a later time. One question being simply; does a platinum/palladium print have more "worth" than a gold or palladium toned Kallitype or salt paper print of the same size? You better believe I'm thinking about this issue as a printer, and soon to be gallery exhibitor asking money for my prints. I am not the greedy type, but I do believe an artist should be able to make some profit from their work, and knowledge. There will be more written on this in future articles, as that part of photographic art that gets little attention.

This image has long been the focus of my desire to print. I have that print in a portfolio of salted silver prints I made thirty years ago, just before my gallery was blown to pieces from water canons, from a grease fire in a restaurant below my gallery in an historical building; The Tiffany Building, Eugene, Oregon, 1987. The 'color' of the negative, and reciprocally the print, is to my color limited eye as a 'warm coppery' color, which I found to be most appealing to the eye. Well, my eye anyway.
I can only attribute this to the combination of the late afternoon sunlight and the pyro/OH developer that replicated the long tonal range of the scene. This negative was made to print on salted paper at the longer tonal scale end of that process. I used a 13% silver solution and 2 1/2% salted paper to achieve this. This is also the ideal printing range of palladium, and with the addition of (Na2) platinum in a 2.5% solution (2 drops~ 5x7) one ends up with a true platinum/palladium image.

The Negative: Kodak Super XX (250)
Negative Developer; Pyro/hydroxide 18 minutes (Windish Pyro) reformulated
Paper; Revere Platinum
Print Developer; Ammonium Citrate (Bostick & Sullivan) pre-mix
Coating solution; (5x7) Palladium 12 drops (B&S pre-mix) ~ Ferric Oxalate (Part 1) 11 drops, platinum (sodium chloroplatinate) @ 2.5% (solution) 2 drops.
All the above chemical mixtures for printing are from Bostick & Sullivan; palladium (15%), ferric oxalate Part 1 (27%), platinum (Na2) (20% ~ diluted with distilled water to make 2.5%) For the curious that would be 1ml platinum to 7ml distilled water. At 2 drops per print, that original 10ml of platinum will make more prints than you will likely have time to make.

Platinum/Palladium Print
"Willamette Afternoon" ~ 5x7 ~ 2/5
Eugene, Oregon




































Monday, August 14, 2017

Downtime ~ New Solid State Hard Disk

The Mac Book Pro I use for this enterprise is old. Like me. The hard disk is all but limping along, with data speeds like a 286. Many of you won't know what that is... The brilliant young men at my neighborhood computer store will be pulling out the old hard drive and installing a nice new 480 gig solid state HD. That is touted to be ten times faster than the old 7200rpm spin up models of yesteryear. There was a time when a 7200rpm HD was smokin' fast, but that's not for here....

Tomorrow is a printing day, after dropping off my laptop. I will have new platinum/palladium images to show when the laptop returns. These will be Oregon scenics. Stay tuned.


Friday, August 11, 2017

Platinum/Palladium Print

I spent many hours on the banks of the Willamette River, as it meandered through Eugene, Oregon. Some very nice walking/bike paths ran along the western bank of that river, usually with sumptuous blackberries growing wild in bushes four feet wide along those banks. The light during the spring and summer months was very conducive to black and white photography.

Most of the images I captured along the river were usually late afternoon and sunset shots, as the light tended to create the 'golden glow' most of the time, and that, was when I was set up and ready. This image was shot where the river widened, and became much shallower, creating the shallow rapids in the image, along with the still pools beside them. It was late afternoon with the sun creating a soft glow on the vegetation on the banks.

Platinum/Palladium Print
"Looking up River" ~ 5x7 ~ 2.5
Eugene, Oregon


































Thursday, August 10, 2017

Continued Platinum/Palladium Printing

I am finally making some progress with what is becoming Portfolio II. Getting the momentum moving once again after so many interruptions and obstacles. The more simplified the process the better results. Basically, as it has always been, before technology became more important than the results. I confess to have been swayed by the lure of digital technology, and the cool stuff that can be done therein. Just doing black and white photography isn't cheap, for the most part.

I do not spend the time necessary to keep a blog moving along for money or fame. I do it for the love of black and white photography in general, and hand coated processes in particular. Passing along the knowledge of the craft is simply giving back, helping in small ways in keeping the energy flowing to those who find this craft worth pursuing. I see the historical hand coated photographic processes as photographic printmaking. Not so different from the original Intaglio method using ink and a press, which technically describes a photogravure. The battle of whether black and white photography is a fine art, or even Art, has been settled, and what remains is mastering a printing medium to demonstrate the Art form. Be an artist.

That's the other side of the technical issues of black and white photography. What's the point and what are you going to do with the prints you make. That's an easy 250 word ramble. Here, though, I stick to the most recent print. Truth be told, this is the same image I printed very recently in Palladium. It printed just fine. The reason for the reprinting is simply because the platinum arrived, and this is the perfect image to try it out on, as this is likely the most perfect negative I ever created, technically. I wanted to see the difference between the two versions, side by side. I was impressed actually. What was said of the Na2 method of printing a palladium print; adding platinum, is now right in front of me.

Quick rehash; using the platinum keeps any reticulation in the image from occurring, due to using the chelated ferric oxalate (Part B), and, it also keeps any 'bronzing' in the lower tonal range of the palladium print. The point of the addition of the platinum is for contrast control. The above benefits come with the platinum use as a contrast control. The thinner the negative, the more concentrate the platinum solution needed, up to the original 20% solution. The negative for this print is roughly log 1.8 so no contrast boost is needed. I still get the added benefits of the platinum as noted above, as well as another note spoken of by the creators of this method; that there is better tonal separation and detail enhancement with the use of the platinum. That is exactly what I saw when putting the two prints side by side.

Also note, that the addition of platinum to the palladium necessitates for print time, as the platinum is slower than palladium. The platinum basically slows down the printing by blocking the highlight more than the lower tonal range, thereby holding back printing in of those upper densities, and that, increases printing time. The holding back of whites, and the increased print time to print them down, effectively increases the tonal range of the print. I also have negatives that have a much shorter density range that I will be printing. To keep them bright as the more contrasty negatives, I will add two drops of either a 5% or 10% platinum solution to the sensitizing solution; palladium/ferric oxalate. So, it would look like this;

5"x7" print ~ palladium 12 drops ~ ferric oxalate 11 drops ~ platinum solution (2.5%) 2 drops

I use a "Puddle Pusher" for coating the paper, which doesn't waste a drop of solution like a Hake brush will. The difference between the two might be equivalent to about four drops or so. What that means is that I was able to cut back on the above formula and still get very good results.

5"7" print ~ palladium 10 drops ~ ferric oxalate 9 drops ~ platinum solution (2.5%) 2 drops
There is still plenty of solution to coat the paper and reap a fine print. You just don't use the extra donated to the brush. Another advantage of this is that by reducing the primary sensitizing solution and keeping the platinum constant, means that the ratio of platinum to palladium is increased. Deeper blacks and more of them.
A reprint of the same image, printed in palladium (two posts back)

Platinum/Palladium Print
"Jerome House" ~ 5x7 ~ 3/5
Eugene, Oregon



































Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Platinum/Palladium Print

It doesn't take long for the viewer to realize I shot a lot of images along a river. During the thirteen years I lived in Eugene, Oregon, on the north side along River Loop #1, which all but touched the Willamette River, I spent many hours along the banks of that river, at different times of day. Late afternoon just before sunset became my favorite time, with the blue spectral light of the Willamette Valley of Oregon.

There will be several more images along the river theme, all now being printed as platinum/palladium images. For my taste, exactly the treatment I had in mind when I began hand coated printing in 1983. Previous articles have outlined the properties of the negatives and the paper I'm using so I won't keep re-posting.

Platinum/Palladium Print
"Sunset on the Willamette" ~ 5x7 ~ 2/5
Eugene, Oregon




















Tuesday, August 8, 2017

First Platinum/Palladium Prints

Officially, I have touched the grail, held it in my own very hands in the form of a platinum/palladium print fresh out of the ETDA baths. More than thirty years I thought of this moment, actually just the thought of ever doing it in my lifetime. Because I am using Dick Arentz and Richard Sullivan's newly formulated process for palladium printing, using platinum as the contrast control, as well as creating the blacks in the image so beloved of platinum.

Technically speaking, absolutely noting changed in the process, with exception of adding 2 drops of 2.5% solution of platinum to the standard palladium printing mix. The platinum adds two desirable affects to the print. First, there is no reticulation of the image using platinum, instead of a chelated oxalate as the contrast control. Second, it eliminates any normal 'bronzing' of the palladium image, which shows up in the shadows and black areas. With the platinum, no bronzing, and rich blacks where desired. Also, as noted in the presentation of their formula, there is better tonal separation and a sort of creamier image. I immediately noted the rich blacks of the first image out in the test print. No softening of the darker regions of shadow details with the platinum, those regions became rich black.

All technical aspects of this print and negative, are the same as the earlier straight palladium prints; Negatives ~ Kodak 250 Super XX rated (160) Developed pyro/OH 15-18 minutes
Printed on Revere Platinum paper ~ toothier side
Direct sunlight ~ 7 minutes

Platinum/Palladium print
"The Horse Pasture"
Eugene, Oregon



































Monday, August 7, 2017

New Palladium Print

I have been making good progress with the advances in printing the portfolios. What continues to change, over time, is the printing itself. When I began, I was mostly printing salt paper prints, a holdover from earlier times when that was the process I used exclusively at the time. After taking up the printing recently I began making Kallitype prints. Truth be told, I had thought I wouldn't like it as much as salt paper printing simply because it was a developing out process, when direct inspection of the image during printing is an entirely different thing.

Turns out, I came to like the Kallitype printing, a lot. And when I became ever more familiar with the process, and began seeing a lot of similarities to the platinum/palladium process, I began liking it even more. That turns out, was a good thing, a sort of practiced warm up for the palladium printing to come, and that is turning out better than I could have hoped. The final piece to this process that made palladium printing even better, was the Na2 method, described in the last post. A method developed by Dick Arentz and Richard Sullivan. The simple of it is getting rid of the tradition contrast control element of platinum/palladium printing (ferric oxalate with potassium chlorate) and replace it with a sodium based platinum; sodium chloroplatanate. For the contrast control aspect, different solutions of the platinum are used, beginning with the stock 20% solution, 2 drops for a 5x7 image, if the negative is very soft. The solutions are reduced to 10%, 5% and 2.5% solutions, to be used on medium to contrasty negatives, respectively.

This will likely be the last pure palladium print I will be making. The following prints, beginning tomorrow, will be platinum/palladium prints. Just exactly how deeply awesome that will be will have to wait until then, but I am fairly confident I will be most happy with the results.

The negatives I am currently printing in this portfolio were shot thirty years ago, using Kodak 250 Super XX film, developed in pyro/OH for 18 minutes. They would represent negatives with a density range of approximately 1.5 to 1.8, which is considered optimal for printing platinum/palladium. The palladium images I have been posting are just that, palladium and ferric oxalate. No contrast control needed. I will now begin to use the platinum in the 2.5% solution, adding 2 drops to the normal pd~12 drops fo~11 drops. That mixture remains the same. The extra platinum drops are added to the normal drop count of a print. I explained the benefits of that in the last post so won't repeat it here.

This particular negative, "Jerome House", is likely the most perfect negative I ever shot, density and image detail and texture wise. I would chalk that up to everything lining up, including the light at the time of the shot. The tonal separation, texture and detail is as perfect as a cheap lens allows. What I had wanted to know, for many years, is just how close can a hand coated silver print, using the salt paper process, come to the look and textural feel of a platinum/palladium print? The answer arrived when I made two palladium prints using the same negative I did those years ago, and the images are strikingly similar. I'm not sure many could tell which is why by looking. On the one hand I'm sort of jazzed about that, having made such a print, in both processes.

This print was made in full sunlight, for 8 minutes. The whites are now in the zone 7/8 range, so the printer now has to decide if more time is warranted to print down the zone 8 whites into zone 7 whites, without suppressing the tones below them. For now, I am fairly happy with the print. I will of course be reprinting this image very soon, with platinum in the palladium.

Palladium Print
"Jerome House" ~ 5x7 ~ 2/5
Jerome, Arizona

Preparing New Portfolio

The print tests for the straight palladium prints was most successful, as noted in an earlier post. The 5x7 negatives I am printing from have a density range between log 1.2 to 1.8, and for palladium printing, it is magical. The new order of Revere Platinum paper arrived and has been cut to 7"x9 1/2", ready for coating with palladium. What I am waiting for now is the arrival of 10ml of platinum, which will be used in reduced solution, to be added to the palladium/oxalate mixture, and that will render the final print a platinum/palladium print. For me, the grail of photographic printing.

I am going the way of Dick Arentz and Richard Sullivan who have come up with a variation on palladium printing. The historical process of platinum/palladium printing is very similar to the Kallitype process, mixing the iron binder with the noble metal making up the sensitizing solution. For Kallitype the binder is a 20% solution of ferric oxalate. In palladium printing the same iron binder of ferric oxalate is used, at 27%. There is also a second ferric oxalate solution (27%) in palladium printing, this oxalate solution has potassium chlorate mixed in, and that becomes the contrast control part of the formula, or Part B of the A:B:C parts of palladium printing. Part C is of course the noble metal; palladium, platinum or platinum/palladium. Both intermix quite seamlessly with each other.

Platinum leaves a very black and white image, deep rich blacks and crisp whites, if done right. Platinum has a shorter printing scale than palladium, and is a bit less sensitive. Palladium is very forgiving and can handle negatives that might print on a silver gelatin paper, as well as negatives up to 1.8 density range. The print time would change. Palladium leaves a warm toned image for the most part, and like the Kallitype, the image color can be altered by the developer used. The traditional developer for platinum/palladium is potassium oxalate, but being that chemistry tends to be a bit toxic with precautions offered for its use, other developers have become popular. Potassium oxalate leaves the traditional warm brown color to a palladium print. I  use ammonium citrate as a developer, which is less toxic and leaves a more neutral black tone, although still a warm toned image.

The new method of palladium printing mentioned above is referred to as a double sodium formula, or Na2 method, likely because the platinum is used as the contrast control, replacing the old Part B (chelated oxalate). The platinum is sodium based, not potassium based. The historical platinum used for printing is a 20% solution of potassium chloroplatinite; palladium is 15% solution of sodium chloropalladite. The new formula uses sodium chloroplatinate in diluted solutions, added to the palladium/oxalate mixture before printing.

The advantages to this method of palladium printing is that the chelated oxalate used as the contrast control caused a reticulation in the image. A sort of breaking up of the image that mimics 'grain', which increased with the increase in its use in the mixture. The platinum addition keeps any reticulation from occurring, as well as helps separate tonal values and adds a depth to the image. One other very helpful use of the platinum is that the more light you add to palladium, an effect referred to as 'bronzing' occurs, mostly in the blacks and deeper shadow areas, whereas the black tends to begin to show a sort of hazy covering, something like solarization in a subtle form. The platinum keeps this from happening, turning those areas a deep black, as platinum tends to do.

All of which adds up to the simple fact that regardless which base variation of platinum used, the print will be a platinum/palladium print. The dilution part of this is through the dilution of the platinum, beginning with the original 20% solution as it arrives. Two drops of that in a 5x7 print mixture would be for a very thin, flat negative to boost it enough to print well. A 10% solution would be used for a bit contrastier negative, 5% solution for a more contrasty negative still, and 2 drops of a 2.5% solution is to be added to the palladium mixture for a negative in the 1.5 to 1.8 range, which is what I am printing with.

As for affordability, this is far cheaper than imagined. 10ml of sodium chloroplatinate costs $99. 1 ml of that will make 8ml of 2.5% platinum solution, which is what I will be using. 2 drops per print, of 8 ml of solution, which converts (very loosely) to a lot of printing. 1 ml is approximately 20 drops, times 8ml, which comes out to about eighty prints for that original 1ml. Take that times ten, and I can print for a number of years with that original bottle.

The printing of this new portfolio begins as soon as the platinum arrives, and the sun shines. I will of course post images of the prints as I make them. That will satisfy the momentum I had hoped would be evident by this time. As all good photographers know, patience is key to success.

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

New Palladium tests

The palladium printing, using the 5x7 negatives, is  moving along swimmingly. The density range of those negatives, shot thirty years ago, are in the range of log 1.2 to 1.8. In simple terms, they don't print well in the UV printer. They require real sunshine for a good print. I have been learning a great deal about printing boundaries of silver and palladium salts. There are numerous similarities, both chemically speaking, in relationship to printing out or developing out, procedural order, chemical reactants and other variable. The latest revelation having to do with density range demands between silver and palladium.

Having now devoured four photographic "Bibles" by four very competent photographers speaking on this subject, there is consensus with procedures and outcomes, although each author takes the reader down slightly different roads to get to the cabin. In doing so, each author showcased an element worthy of further study. One such element being a newer and better method of contrast control for palladium printing. And that, has to do with density range of the corresponding negative. The baseline standard density range would be that of a negative that would make a good image on a commercial silver gelatin grade 2 paper.

What is made abundantly clear is that to achieve a good palladium print, the negative should have a density range of 1.2 to 1.8. That is a dense negative. One that takes a very long time to print in a UV printer. This would also be a good density range for printing in silver, either salt paper or Kallitype. I bring these two up merely because I have printed extensively in both processes. There are even levels of silver solution and salt (iron binder) to accommodate a long spectrum of density ranges. I would tell you that silver isn't as forgiving as palladium.

For now I continue to print the 5x7 negatives until I have a full portfolio of those images. The next step for me is switching over all printing to palladium and gum. Retire the silver. A recent photo outing with a local photographer friend turned out well, as we at the edge of Cochise Stronghold while different thunderstorms played out all around us. Under the circumstances, this was a digital outing, and I had my old trusty Canon 20D, shooting in RAW mode set to black and white. I also kept in mind that my normal shooting mode to shoot edge to edge as I see it needed to be opened up sufficiently to allow for later cropping from the 8x12 to 8x10 format.

What I want to know is simply this; can I take any existing digital image and print it in palladium using my UV printer. In Lightroom, I took the original image and snapped it out a bit, using the four basic control slides, to separate the tonal values better and accentuate the overall image. That image then went through Paintshop Pro to reverse the image, and add a <curves> function, increasing the densities as said Bibles proscribed. Then I tried making a palladium print using the UV printer.

The test print said it all. The image was about halfway to fully printed in. Zone 7 was just forming, at 7 minute print time. As I observed while printing the denser 5x7 negatives, the amount of image that will be seen before development, has everything to do with the density range of the negative. If the negative is 'soft', that is of normal density (think silver gel print) then one would see the "whisper" noted in the books. If the negative has a density range of 1.8, I can tell you first hand that you will need to see way more than even the "stage whisper" spoken of for a Kallitype. It's the same function. The more density range of the negative, the more the undeveloped image must be seen before development. With four print trials to draw from, with those dense negatives, zone 4 (at least) needs to be seen and I look for the beginning of zone 5.

That negative I just printed has far more contrast than needed. The print time was 7 minutes, and half the image is in. That negative would print well in the open sun. That isn't what I'm after. I want to use the UV printer because the output is exactly the same each and every time I use it. No guesswork involved. I have retraced my steps and undone the <curves> adjustment to the image. It is now back to a simple reversal of the original image, just a bit more snappy. That, is the next test, and I expect it to return some very nice results.

Original Positive image;
This is what the final print is to look like;